Most of the authors look at peer review as something which is a ‘black box’ and ‘a hurdle to be crossed’. That is ironical as peer review exists to ensure that good science prospers and is shared. A better appreciation of the respective roles of the authors, reviewers and editors is desirable for a good publication to emerge. Over the years, peer review has taken many shapes and continues to evolve. Munishwar Nath Gupta Peer Review: Past, present and future Current Science Volume: 105 Issue: 2 Pages: 159-161 Published: JUL 25 2013
From PubPeer FAQ
Q: Why should I bother to take the time to write a comment about an article on PubPeer? The goal of PubPeer is to foster a scientific environment where robust, high-quality research is valued, while providing a forum to discuss the problems of unreproducible, misleading, misconceived or fraudulent work.